Skip to content

OrthoWest · Carrollton, Georgia

Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Ultra-minimally invasive care through less than dime-sized incisions — motion-preserving options when they fit.

Your surgeon

Drew Albert, MD MBA

Spine surgeon at Ortho West in Carrollton, Georgia. Fellowship-trained in endoscopic and motion-preserving spine surgery.

Portrait of Drew Albert, MD MBA
Healed 8 mm endoscopic spine incision next to a U.S. dime for scale

Ultra-minimally invasive

Less than a dime

Endoscopic approaches use a pencil-width camera and instruments through an incision often about 8 mm.

Patient education imagery courtesy of Arthrex. Used with permission.

Why endoscopic

Smaller path. Clearer recovery goals.

  • Faster recovery and return to normal activity8
  • Fewer postoperative complications and infections, less disruption to surrounding soft tissue, and a shorter hospital stay3,5,9
  • Endoscopic lumbar medial branch transection (MBT) is safe, effective, and provides long-term benefits up to 5 years postsurgery10
  • Requires smaller incisions, which leads to less muscle trauma compared to open or tubular surgeries

Endoscopic options

Four approaches. One philosophy.

Matched to your anatomy and diagnosis — not a one-size-fits-all incision.

Illustration of endoscope positioned for medial branch nerve transection at the lumbar facet
01

Medial Branch Transection

Targets facet-related low-back pain by transecting the medial branch sensory nerve through an endoscopic approach.

Illustration of endoscope accessing an L5–S1 disc herniation via the interlaminar approach
02

Interlaminar Approach

Treats herniated discs and stenosis — commonly at L4–L5 or L5–S1 — with direct endoscopic visualization.

Illustration of endoscope accessing the spine through a transforaminal approach with highlighted nerve target
03

Transforaminal Approach

Removes herniated disc material through a small incision along the ridge of the back, often at L3–L4 or L4–L5.

Illustration of endoscope performing a posterior cervical foraminotomy to decompress a cervical nerve root
04

Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy

Relieves cervical nerve-root compression from the back of the neck through a small endoscopic corridor — often for arm pain or radiculopathy from foraminal stenosis or disc pathology.

Published outcomes

<0 weeks

Average return to work4

0%

of patients returned to athletics6,7

Postoperative management is patient-specific and dependent on the treating professional's assessment. Individual results will vary and not all patients will experience the same postoperative activity level or outcomes.

Next step

How can I help?

Clinic

Ortho West Spine

812 S Park St Ste 3
Carrollton, GA 30117

References

  1. 1.Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor AH. Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):344.
  2. 2.Urits I, Burshtein A, Sharma M, et al. Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(3):23.
  3. 3.Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(6):521-530.
  4. 4.Lewandrowski KU, Ransom NA, Yeung A. Return to work and recovery time analysis after outpatient endoscopic lumbar transforaminal decompression surgery. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(Suppl 1):S100-S115.
  5. 5.Polikandriotis JA, Hudak EM, Perry MW. Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):13-16.
  6. 6.Sairyo K, Matsuura T, Higashino K, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for athletes. J Spine. 2013;S5(006):1-4.
  7. 7.Sivakanthan S, Williams JR, Feroze AH, et al. Endoscopic spine surgery in athletes: case series and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2021;145:702-707.
  8. 8.Gadjradj PS, Broulikova HM, van Dongen JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica. Br J Sports Med. Published online February 20, 2022.
  9. 9.Page PS, Ammanuel SG, Josiah DT. Evaluation of endoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy: a multi-center retrospective review utilizing the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e25202.
  10. 10.Du R, Gao J, Wang B, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and endoscopic neurotomy for lumbar facet joint syndrome: are they good enough? Eur Spine J. 2024;33(2):463-473.
  11. 11.Siddiqi F, Romero J, O’Donnel C, Hayes V. Five year long-term results of endoscopic dorsal ramus rhizotomy and anatomic variations of the painful lumbar facet joint. Paper presented at: Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Annual Conference; November 1-3, 2013; Las Vegas, NV.
  12. 12.Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(9):931-939.

Reference list aligned with Arthrex Endoscopic Spine. Links open PubMed or the publisher DOI when available.

Clinical illustrations and patient-education imagery courtesy of Arthrex. Used with permission.